By Jason Renard Walker

The 2019 sudden death of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein came as a shocker to the victims seeking civil and criminal justice for the crimes against them. It may have even come as relief to any unnamed individuals involved in the scandal, if they exist, who Epstein could’ve easily fingered, as part of another sweetheart deal with prosecutors.

Epstein’s death happened during Donald Trump’s first presidential term, yet Republicans like Kash Patel, Pam Bondi and podcaster Dan Bongino didn’t show signs of promoting the non disclosure of the Epstein files as being a scandalous coverup, until Joe Biden’s term in office was coming to a close. But why would they? Their obsession proved to be nothing more than to distract the media and public from focusing on Trump’s legal woes and the January 6 insurrection that he instigated and was facing felony charges for. While giving the Republican party an extra arrow in their quiver to use during the upcoming election.

Republicans swore that the reason Biden refused to release the files in its entirety was because it possibly contained a client list Epstein kept, with the names of left leaning public figures on it like Democrat Bill Clinton. What makes this assertion logical is the fact that Epstein had a habit of keeping notes of things important to him. One of these things is the other list of names (containing mobsters and known sex traffickers) he stashed like an old pirate’s map, decades ago, in one of the most improbable places a pedophile would hide his contacts, the federal courts.

Both, Bondi and Patel stated on podcasts and in press releases that if team MAGA were ever in position they would unapologetically release every document related to Epstein’s criminal charges and wouldn’t dare protect the names of any pedophiles, that may exist on a client’s list, like Biden seemed to be doing. But Bondi had an earlier opportunity to do this or charge Epstein, while serving as Attorney General in Florida, for acts of pedophilia he got a slap on the wrist for in the early 2000’s. Yet she showed no interest in him.

While Trump humbly distanced himself from pressing Biden to release the files, he did use his base’s plight as fodder to campaign on. He suggested that a Democrat led deep state within the government existed that was concealing the truth about many things from Americans. He convinced his voters he would use his second term to bust it up, release all the Epstein files, add transparency within his cabinet and depoliticize the FBI and Department of Justice. Agencies he falsely said Biden used to criminally charge him, and try to keep him out of office because he sought to expose the truth about the way the American government is really ran.

It seems that the very deep state, file release denier and agency politicizer that Trump promised he would dismantle, he and his MAGA maniacs quickly became as soon as his inauguration ended and Cinderella’s clock struck twelve.

Now that Bondi is head of the Department of Justice and Kash Patel is director of the FBI they are in perfect position to do what they accused Biden of not wanting to do. Though After getting a sneak peak of how deep the rabbit hole in these files goes, you are starting to see the zeal they once had for releasing the Epstein files dwindle to defenders of not releasing them at all.

Opportunistic praise could be given to Elon Musk. After he and Trump fell out over a disagreement on Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ Musk threw a low blow on social media claiming the reason Trump hadn’t released the Epstein files was because his own name was in it. This reignited Republicans and the media’s interest in the files most people lost interest in moved on from that Democrats long suggested had nothing revealing.

In an effort to push back on Republicans, who are seeking approval from Congress to set up a voting bloc on whether the Epstein files should be released, House Speaker Mike Johnson sent members home early for a month long break. A subtle measure designed to cause delays in having to address the Epstein files mania in this fashion.

Trump does not want Bondi to appoint a special prosecutor to assist in the matter, Congress blocked votes on measures that would force the DOJ to release more information from the files and Trump fired Maurene Comey, the lead prosecutor in Ghislaine Maxwell’s (Epstein’s co conspirator) conviction. Plus days ago, at the nay say of his family, the Trump administration released the complete set of MLK’s assassination records (years in advance of the scheduled release date) as another way to redirect attention away from the Epstein debacle.

Looking at the situation under these circumstances only make sceptics believe prominent members of the left and right are hiding something that the Epstein files will blow the lid off of.

On January 17 1990 Epstein filed a petition with the United States District Court in the Northern District of Illinois. This case was docketed as cause No. 90 C 263 and can be viewed online under: In re safety, 1990 U.S. Dist Lexis 1224.

As Judge James B Moran mentioned in his ruling on the matter on January 31 1990:

“Jeffrey Epstein, acting pro se (as his own attorney), filed a complaint with the clerk of this court. He then filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis (as a poor person unable to pay the filing fee). Epstein’s complaint, which names no defendants and is titled simply ” In the matter of safety” fails to allege any facts that state a right to relief under the law or constitution of the United States. The complaint asks this court:

“to order the cook county coroners office, the cook county State’s Attorney’s office and the Chicago police department and any other relevant government or nongovernment body to release any photographs, and autopsy and other reports that related to the deaths of Barry Bowers, Michael and Tony Spilotro and Honorable Judge Allen Rosin and to enter any other prudent orders in order to protect the safety of [Approximately three dozen named persons].”

Of course Epstein wasn’t granted any relief. First, if Epstein really felt this was a situation addressable by the courts, a person of his stature would’ve hired the assistance of an attorney. Second, he knew he wouldn’t have been eligible to proceed as a poor person anyways because the filing fee was only a couple hundred bucks.

Its plausible that his mission was to use this bogus filing as a mechanism to forever store dozens of names of particular individuals in his circle, while alerting potential future scrutinizers that the mentioned dead died as a result of whatever the three dozen were still involved in at that time. Possibly creating a trail to be followed years later.

I had a source attempt to get a copy of Epstein’s complaint from the courts, which lists the names of the thirty or so people, but they said they were told the files couldn’t be located. Another request to just get the names or knowledge whether any or all were dead was also rejected. I believe that if that list was obtained there’s a good chance some of these same names might appear in the files Trump doesn’t want us to see.

Michael and Tony Spilotro were well known members of a Chicago mob who hung with other mobsters that dabbled in prostitution rings and black market brothels, whose murders gained a lot of media attention. Just before Michael was killed in 1986, his recorded dealings with undercover agents that were monitoring a brothel, was used to convict mobster Michael Posner of various federal crimes in the late 1980’s.

This rejected petition Epstein filed ultimately could expose his connections with mobs, Trump and his desire to exploit women as far back as the mid 1980’s. There are many questions that will probably never be answered in the Epstein case and his questionable, subsequent death. From the complaint he filed, it seems he believes that several noteworthy mob murders have sketchy medical examiner conclusions and that dozens of others, in the same vein, are at risk of being killed too. If he knew this much, shouldn’t he have known who the killers are, or why anyone would want to harm the others?

In any event here are some questions that a reader might be able to answer themselves, or give me insight on:

1) What was Epstein’s goal for filing the pro se complaint in the first place?

2) Who is Judge Allen Rosin and what connection, if any, does he have with the names listed in the ruling on the complaint, Epstein and the three dozen other names that weren’t listed?

3) Are any of the people listed in the complaint famous associates of Epstein’s, and if so are any of them still alive, or in the Epstein files that are available to the public?

4) Why would the unnamed people in the ruling need safety and protection, but not Epstein, and how would he know if he wasn’t involved one way or the other?

5) Have any media outlets sought this list of names, or are aware that Epstein asked the courts to protect dozens of unlisted people, and release autopsy reports and photographs of mob related criminals involved in sex trafficking because something didn’t add up?

6) Are the photographs and autopsy reports he references blocked from inspection by the public or media?

7) Why isn’t the original complaint he filed still in the possession of the federal courts of Illinois, if it really isn’t?

One thing is certain: Epstein was involved in more illegal activities than we are being led to believe. If pedophilia was just entertainment that involved no clients he didn’t profited off of, what was his money making business?

We must remember the Trump administration has lifted the veil on how the government and its hydra of agencies has long thrived on inventing their own conclusions to events they always have the final say in. It is clear Epstein was well aware of the consequences of engulfing himself in the elite circles that he did, they all do.

Jason Renard Walker 1532092
Powledge Unit
PO Box 660400
Dallas, Tx 75266

Jason Renard Walker is a prison journalist who has been publishing articles and essays in various print and online media outlets since 2016.  You can view his work by visiting his website: www.jasonsprisonjournal.com. You can also purchase his paperback book (available on amazon.com). “Reports From Within The Belly Of The Beast: Torture And Injustice Inside Texas Department Of Criminal Justice.”